|
HOME
Lincoln Home
CEMETERY
NEW SALEM
THOMAS LINCOLN
HODGENVILLE
FAIRWELL ADDRESS
GETTYSBURG ADDRESS
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
NEWS STORY
LINCOLN FINANCE
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
STUDENT STUDY PAGE
|
|
Lincoln's last autobiography was requested by John Locke
Scripps of the Chicago Press and Tribune, who was
writing a campaign biography for Lincoln's 1860 presidential
race. This was his longest one, and provided the best
information on his early years.
(I know some of you will claim I am a bad speller, This
is how He wrote it) |
June, 1860
Abraham Lincoln was born Feb. 12, 1809, then in
Hardin, now in the more recently formed county of
Larue, Kentucky. His father, Thomas, & grand-father,
Abraham, were born in Rockingham county Virginia,
whither their ancestors had come from Berks county
Pennsylvania. His lineage has been traced no farther
back than this. The family were originally quakers,
though in later times they have fallen away from the
peculiar habits of that people. The grand-father
Abraham, had four brothers - Isaac, Jacob, John &
Thomas. So far as known, the descendants of Jacob
and John are still in Virginia. Isaac went to a
place near where Virginia, North Carolina, and
Tennessee, join; and his decendants are in that
region. Thomas came to Kentucky, and after many
years, died there, whence his decendants went to
Missouri. Abraham, grandfather of the subject of
this sketch, came to Kentucky, and was killed by
indians about the year 1784. He left a widow, three
sons and two daughters. The eldest son, Mordecai,
remained in Kentucky, till late in life, when he
removed to Hancock county, Illinois, where soon
after he died, and where several of his descendants
still reside. The second son, Josiah, removed at an
early day to a place on Blue River, now within
Harrison [Hancock] county, Indiana; but no recent
information of him, or his family, has been
obtained. The eldest sister, Mary, married Ralph
Crume and some of her descendants are now known to
be in Breckenridge county, Kentucky. The second
sister, Nancy, married William Brumfield, and her
family are not known to have left Kentucky, but
there is no recent information from them. Thomas,
the youngest son, and father of the present subject,
by the early death of his father, and very narrow
circumstances of
his mother, even in childhood
was a wandering laboring boy, and grew up litterally
without education. He never did more in the way of
writing than to bunglingly sign his own name. Before
he was grown, he passed one year as a hired hand
with his uncle Isaac on Wata[u]ga, a branch of the
Holsteen [Holston] River. Getting back into
Kentucky, and having reached his 28th. year, he
married Nancy Hanks -- mother of the present subject
-- in the year 1806. She also was born in Virginia;
and relatives of hers of the name of Hanks, and of
other names, now reside in Coles, in Macon, and in
Abrams counties, Illinois, and also in Iowa. The
present subject has no brother or sister of the
whole or half blood. He had a sister, older than
himself, who was grown and married, but died many
years ago, leaving no child. Also a brother, younger
than himself, who died in infancy. Before leaving
Kentucky he and his sister were sent for short
periods, to A.B.C. schools, the first kept by
Zachariah Riney, and the second by Caleb Hazel.
At this time his father
resided on Knob-creek, on the road from Bardstown
Ky. to Nashville Tenn. At a point three, or three
and a half miles South or South-West of Atherton's
ferry on the Rolling Fork. From this place he
removed to what is now Spencer county Indiana, in
the autumn of 1816, A. then being in his eigth year.
This removal was partly on account of slavery; but
chiefly on account of the difficulty in land titles
in Ky. He settled in an unbroken forest; and the
clearing away of surplus wood was the great task a
head. A. though very young, was large of his age and
had an axe put into his hands at once; and from that
till within his twentythird year, he was almost
constantly handling that most useful instrument --
less, of course, in plowing and harvesting seasons.
At this place A. took an early start as a hunter,
which was never much improved afterwards. (A few
days before the completion of his eight year, in the
absence of his father, a flock of wild turkeys
approached the new log-cabin, and A. with a rifle
gun, standing inside, shot through a crack, and
killed one of them. He has never since pulled a
trigger on any larger game.) In the autumn of 1818
his mother died; and a year afterwards his father
married Mrs. Sally Johnston, at Elizabeth-Town, Ky
-- a widow, with three children of her first
marriage. She proved a good and kind mother to A.
and is still living in Coles Co. Illinois. There
were no children of this second marriage. His
father's residence continued at the same place in
Indiana, till 1830. While here A. went to A.B.C.
schools by littles, kept successively by Andrew
Crawford, ---- Sweeney, and Azel W. Dorsey. He does
not remember any other. The family of Mr. Dorsey now
reside in Schuyler Co. Illinois. A. now thinks that
the agregate of all his schooling did not amount to
one year. He was never in a college or Academy as a
student; and never inside of a college or accademy
building till since he had a law-license. What he
has in the way of education, he has picked up. After
he was twentythree, and had separated from his
father, he studied English grammar, imperfectly of
course, but so as to speak and write as well as he
now does. He studied and nearly mastered the
Six-books of Euclid, since he was a member of
Congress. He regrets his want of education, and does
what he can to supply the want. In his tenth year he
was kicked by a horse, and apparently killed for a
time. When he was nineteen, still residing in
Indiana, he made his first trip upon a flat-boat to
New-Orleans. He was a hired hand merely; and he and
a son of the owner, without other assistance, made
the trip. The nature of part of the cargo-load, as
it was called -- made it necessary for them to
linger and trade along the Sugar coast -- and one
night they were attacked by seven negroes with
intent to kill and rob them. They were hurt some in
the melee, but succeeded in driving the negroes from
the boat, and then "cut cable" "weighed anchor" and
left.
March 1st, 1830 -- A.
having just completed his 21st. year, his father and
family, with the families of the two daughters and
sons-in-law, of his step-mother, left the old
homestead in Indiana, and came to Illinois. Their
mode of conveyance was waggons drawn by ox-teams, or
A. drove one of the teams. They reached the county
of Macon, and stopped there some time within the
same month of March. His father and family settled a
new place on the North side of the Sangamon river,
at the junction of the timber-land and prairie,
about ten miles Westerly from Decatur. Here they
built a log-cabin, into which they removed, and made
sufficient of rails to fence ten acres of ground,
fenced and broke the ground, and raised a crop of
sow[n] corn upon it the same year. These are, or are
supposed to be, the rails about which so much is
being said just now, though they are far from being
the first, or only rails ever made by A.
The sons-in-law, were temporarily settled at other
places in the county. In the autumn all hands were
greatly afflicted with augue and fever, to which
they had not been used, and by which they were
greatly discouraged -- so much so that they
determined on leaving the county. They remained
however, through the succeeding winter, which was
the winter of the very celebrated "deep snow" of
Illinois. During that winter, A. together with his
stepmother's son, John D. Johnston, and John Hanks,
yet residing in Macon country, hired themselves to
one Denton Offutt, to take a flat boat from
Beardstown, Illinois to New-Orleans; and for that
purpose, were to join him -- Offut -- at Spingfield,
Ills so soon as the snow should go off. When it did
go off which was about the 1st. of March 1831 -- the
county was so flooded, as to make travelling by land
impracticable; to obviate which difficulty the[y]
purchased a large canoe and came down the Sangamon
river in it. This is the time and manner of A's
first entrance into Sangamon County. They found
Offutt at Springfield, but learned from him that he
had failed in getting a boat at Beardstown. This
lead to their hiring themselves to him at $12 per
month, each; and getting the timber out of the trees
and building a boat at old Sangamon Town on the
Sangamon river, seven miles N.W. of Springfield,
which boat they took to New-Orleans, substantially
upon the old contract. It was in connection with
this boat that occurred the
ludicrous incident of sewing up the hogs eyes.
Offutt bought thirty odd large fat live hogs, but
found difficulty in driving them from where [he]
purchased them to the boat, and thereupon conceived
the whim that he could sew up their eyes and drive
them where he pleased. No sooner thought of than
decided, he put his hands, including A. at the job,
which they completed -- all but the driving. In
their blind condition they could not be driven out
of the lot or field they were in. This expedient
failing, they were tied and hauled on carts to the
boat. It was near the Sangamon River, within what is
now Menard county.
During this boat enterprize acquaintance with
Offutt, who was previously an entire stranger, he
conceved a liking for A. and believing he could turn
him to account, he contracted with him to act as
clerk for him, on his return from New-Orleans, in
charge of a store and Mill at New-Salem, then in
Sangamon, now in Menard country. Hanks had not gone
to New-Orleans, but having a family, and being
likely to be detained from home longer than at first
expected, had turned back from St. Louis. He is the
same John Hanks who now engineers the "rail
enterprize" at Decatur; and is a first cousin to A's
mother. A's father, with his own family & others
mentioned, had, in pursuance of their intention,
removed from Macon to Coles country. John D.
Johnston, the step-mother's son, went to them; and
A. stopped indefinitely, and, for the first time, as
it were, by himself at New-Salem, before mentioned.
This was in July 1831. Here he rapidly made
acquaintances and friends. In less than a year
Offutt's business was failing -- had almost failed,
-- when the Black-Hawk war of 1832 -- broke out. A
joined a volunteer company, and to his own surprize,
was elected captain of it. He says he has not since
had any success in life which gave him so much
satisfaction. He went the campaign, served near
three months, met the ordinary hardships of such an
expedition, but was in no battle. He now owns in
Iowa, the land upon which his own warrants for this
service, were located. Returning from the campaign,
and encouraged by his great popularity, among his
immediate neighbors, he, the same year, ran for the
Legislature and was beaten -- his own precinct,
however, casting it's votes 277 for and 7, against
him. And this too while he was an avowed Clay man,
and the precinct the autumn afterwards, giving a
majority of 115 to Genl. Jackson over Mr. Clay. This
was the only time A was ever beaten on a direct vote
of the people. He was now without means and out of
business, but was anxious to remain with his friends
who had treated him with so much generosity,
especially as he had nothing elsewhere to go to. He
studied what he should do -- thought of learning the
black-smith trade -- thought of trying to study law
-- rather thought he could not succeed at that
without a better education. Before long, strangely
enough, a man offered to sell and did sell, to A.
and another as poor as himself, and old stock of
goods, upon credit. They opened as merchants; and he
says that was the store. Of course they did nothing
but get deeper and deeper in debt. He was appointed
Postmaster at New-Salem -- the office being too
insignificant, to make his politics an objection.
The store winked out. The Surveyor of Sangamon,
offered to depute to A that portion of his work
which was within his part of the county. He
accepted, procured a compass and chain, studied
Flint, and Gibson a little, and went at it. This
procured bread, and kept soul and body together. The
election of 1834 came, and he was then elected to
the Legislature by the highest vote cast for any
candidate. Major John T. Stuart, then in full
practice of the law, was also elected. During the
canvass, in a private conversation he encouraged A.
[to] study law. After the election he borrowed books
of Stuart, took them home with him, and went at it
in good earnest. He studied with nobody. He still
mixed in the surveying to pay board and clothing
bills. When the Legislature met, the law books were
dropped, but were taken up again at the end of the
session. He was re-elected in 1836, 1838, and 1840.
In the autumn of 1836 he obtained a law licence, and
on April 15, 1837, removed to Springfield, and
commenced the practice, his old friend, Stuart
taking him into partnership. March 3rd, 1837, by a
protest entered upon the Ills. House Journal of that
date, at pages 817, 818, A. with Dan Stone, another
representative of Sangamon, briefly defined his
position on the slavery question; and so far as it
goes, it was then the same that it is now. The
protest is as follows - (Here insert it) In 1838, &
1840 Mr. L's party in the Legislature voted for him
as Speaker; but being in the minority, he was not
elected. After 1840 he declined a re-election to the
Legislature. He was on the Harrison electoral ticket
in 1840, and on that of Clay in 1844, and spent much
time and labor in both those canvasses. In Nov. 1842
he was married to Mary, daughter of Robert S. Todd,
of Lexington, Kentucky. They have three living
children, all sons -- one born in 1843, one in 1850,
and one in 1853. They lost one, who was born in
1846. In 1846, he was elected to the lower House of
Congress, and served one term only, commencing in
Dec. 1847 and ending with the inauguration of Gen.
Taylor, in March, 1849. All the battles of the
Mexican war had been fought before Mr. L. took his
seat in congress, but the
American army was still in
Mexico, and the treaty of peace was not fully and
formally ratified till the June afterwards. Much as
been said of his course in Congress in regard to
this war. A careful examination of the Journals and
Congressional Globe shows, that he voted for all the
supply measures which came up, and for all the
meeasures in any way favorable to the officers,
soldiers, and their families, who conducted the war
through; with this exception that some of these
measures passed without yeas and nays, leaving no
record as to how particular men voted. The Journals
and Globe also show him voting that the war was
unnecessarily and unconstitutionally begun by the
President of the United States. This is the language
of Mr. Ashmun's amendment, for which Mr. L. and
nearly or quite all, other whigs of the H.R. voted.
Mr. L's reasons for the opinion expressed by this
vote were briefly that the President had sent Genl.
Taylor into an inhabited part of the country
belonging to Mexico, and not to the U.S. and thereby
had provoked the first act of hostility -- in fact
the commencement of the war; that the place, being
the country bordering on the East bank of the Rio
Grande, was inhabited by native Mexicans, born there
under the Mexican government; and had never
submitted to, nor been conquered by Texas, or the
U.S. nor transferred to either by treaty -- that
although Texas claimed the Rio Grande as her
boundary, Mexico had never recognized it, the people
on the ground had never recognized it, and neither
Texas nor the U.S. had ever enforced it -- that
there was a broad desert between that, and the
country over which Texas had actual control -- that
the country where hostilities commenced, having once
belonged to Mexico, must remain so, until it was
somehow legally transferred, which had never been
done.
Mr. L. thought the act of
sending an armed force among the Mexicans, was
unnecessary, inasmuch as Mexico was in no way
molesting, or menacing the U.S. or the people
thereof; and that it was unconstitutional, because
the power of levying war is vested in Congress, and
not in the President. He thought the principal
motive for the act, was to divert public opinion
from the surrender of "Fifty-four, forty, or fight"
to Great Brittain, on the Oregan boundary question.
Mr. L. was not a candidate for re-election. This was
determined upon, and declared before he went to
Washington, in accordance with an understanding
among whig friends, by which Col. Hardin, and Col.
Baker had each previously served a single term in
the same District. In 1848, during his term in
congress, he advocated Gen. Taylor's nomination for
the Presidency, in opposition to all others, and
also took an active part for this election, after
his nomination -- speaking a few times in Maryland,
near Washington, several times in Massachusetts, and
canvassing quite fully his own district in Illinois,
which was followed by a majority in the district of
over 1500 for Gen. Taylor.
Upon his return from Congress he went to the
practice of the law with greater earnestness than
ever before. In 1852 he was upon the Scott electoral
ticket, and did something in the way of canvassing,
but owing to the hopelessness of the cause in
Illinois, he did less than in previous presidential
canvasses.
In 1854, his profession had almost superseded the
thought of politics in his mind, when the repeal of
the Missouri compromise aroused him as he had never
been before.
In the autumn of that year
he took the stump with no broader pratical aim or
object that [than?] to secure, if possible, the
reelection of Hon Richard Yates to congress. His
speeches at once attracted a more marked attention
than they had ever before done. As the canvass
proceeded, he was drawn to different parts of the
state, outside of Mr. Yates' district. He did not
abandon the law, but gave his attention, by turns,
to that and politics. The State agricultural fair
was at Springfield that year, and Douglas was
announced to speak there.
In the canvass of 1856, Mr. L. made over fifty
speeches, no one of which, so far as he remembers,
was put in print. One of them was made at Galena,
but Mr. L. has no recollection of any part of it
being printed; nor does he remember whether in that
speech he said anything about a Supreme court
decision. He may have spoken upon that subject; and
some of the newspapers may have reported him as
saying what is now ascribed to him; but he thinks he
could not have expressed himself as represented |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|